|
Leadership
Coaching Changes Schools

By: Dr. Ella M. Burton
Assistant Professor
Leadership and Counseling
Eastern Michigan University
High
school principals work in a complex environment.
They face heightened demands for accountability,
for student success, and for results. During the last
year the topic of high school reform has emerged as
one of the most discussed, and most contentious, educational
reforms.
Current
attention to school leadership looks at all of the things
principals might do, and
treats these possibilities as if they are the things
principals should do to increase student achievement.
The result is an overstated picture of the job, suggesting
that if schools are to succeed, principals must take
on an increasing array of responsibilities including
instructional leadership, organizational leadership,
and community leadership.
Principals
are expected to provide vision and instructional leadership
on the one hand, and mange
students, staff and community members on the other.
Principals are expected to do this while at the same
time maintaining a safe and orderly environment conducive
to learning and high student achievement.
The principal has the
opportunity to influence each of these factors such
as instructional
resources, school culture and climate, community support,
and people (including students, teachers, parents,
district staff and business and community leaders).
One might then pose the question: “How can the
principal, as an instructional leader, facilitate results-driven
interventions that will have the most direct and immediate
impact on student learning and improvement?” Pressure
to have both academic success and increased student
achievement for all students creates a need for additional
support for the building administrator.
To
affect success in schools, it is critical that consideration
be given to supporting the work
of principals in a manner similar to the professional
development support provided to faculty and staff.
The concept of coaching school administrators, while
not new, is increasing in popularity in public schools
as a means of supporting principals. Coaching can become
that significant and empowering tool available to a
school administrator who faces the challenge of increasing
student achievement and assuring adequate yearly progress.
The Role of a Leadership Coach
The term “coach” is
most commonly applied to the person on the football
field
or basketball court. It is also acceptable to engage
a coach for the purpose of assisting a person in an
individual growth plan. Hiring a coach for the principal,
however, raises the antennae of many school personnel.
The paradigm is that the principal should have the
personal and professional capacity to move teaching
and learning to the level that produces success for
all students. And yet, in many situations, principals
need support to create a breakthrough in their own
work. A Leadership Coach can serve as one way to provide
support for the monumental task of leading the school,
students, faculty, and staff to compete and succeed.
A
distinguishing characteristic of effective
leaders, according to Warren Bennis, is that they are
perpetual learners who are secure in learning about
their work environment and who recognize the importance
of assessing and evaluating their abilities and skills.
It is imperative that every principal possess a passion
for their work. Providing a helpful, supportive coach
for principals is without precedent. However, leadership
coaching is increasingly recognized as a key to develop
the competency of successful leaders as they, in turn,
recognize their duty to develop faculty, students and
community, and are challenged by standards based reform
initiatives that demand success for all student.
Discussions of coaching
generally describe a “helping” relationship intended to build
organizational capacity (Hatch, 200l; Schein, 1999).
At its core, coaching is a supportive helping relationship;
coaches pose questions, challenge principals’ thinking,
and lead them to examine ideas from new perspectives
(Schein, 1999). Trust and rapport must be established,
and the principal must be accepting and not view the
coach as wasting time.
The process must further obligate the
principal and coach to consider questions such as:
1.) What constitutes success in the dialogue?
2.) How are confidential issues handled?
3.) What topics are part of the coaching domain
and how do they affect work performance?
Finding a Leadership Coach
The benefits of a Leadership
Coach are clear. The coach supports and assists the
principal
as they examine their work. The coach’s role
is to affirm when appropriate but always to challenge
principals, to expect reflective thinking, and to support
and nurture the thoughtful consideration of alternatives
for principal work.
Many school reform models, including
those advocated by the Coalition for Essential Schools
(www.essentialschools.org) and The Annenburg Foundation
(www.annenbergfoundation.org), include a Leadership
Coach in their model.
However, leadership coaching may not
be readily available for all high school principals.
Thus some alternatives have emerged. They include the
following:
Identify a Local
Mentor – Identify
a trusted individual, either within or outside of your
school district, and invite them to meet regularly
with you to discuss your work. Be clear about confidentiality
and about your willingness to think and contemplate
how to strengthen and enhance your work.
Use the Resources of The Principals’ Partnership – Utilize
the resources of The Partnership to network with other
principals in your area, or across the country, who
share your interests. During the Summer Leadership
Institute identify an individual or individuals who
might want to work with you on such a project. Raise
the issue at your Partnership Team Meetings.
Contact a Local University – Contact a nearby
college or university, perhaps one where you completed
your training. Investigate the availability of a faculty
member to talk routinely with you about your work.
Remember that nearly all university faculty are expected
to provide some level of service to the off-campus
community. Serving as a Leadership Coach might provide
an opportunity.
Check with Your State ore Regional Principals
Organization – Some
state leadership organizations provide an opportunity
for principals to network with members. Inquire about
the possibility of establishing a network of principals
that could support a leadership coaching initiative.
Conclusion
Coaching
supports the refocusing of leadership in a supportive,
helpful manner that is essential if
principals are to flourish in the presence of current
standards based reform initiatives. Coaching will be
successful if the principal has the determination and
capacity to change. The potential is present for coaching
to become a powerful strategy for developing congruent
behavior between the mission of the school and the
principal. This approach to coaching provides mutual
benefit to both the principal and the school. It is
not a technique or a one time event, but rather should
be seen as a holistic and integrative approach that
has developed over time from a range of leadership
approaches and developmental techniques. It is a strategic
process that adds value both to the person being coached
and also the bottom line of increased student learning
and student performance. Coaching can offer the chance
for the principal to align his behavior with the values
and vision of the organization as well as make a real
impact towards building healthy school culture that
supports success for all.
When all is said and done,
coaching is the strategy that supports principals
in a time when
much is expected of them and there is little attention
paid to the enormity of the task. Coaching provides
a forum to support the principals’ current knowledge,
skill, and disposition, and to allow them to transfer
exiting skills to the task of leading schools in a
time of tumultuous reform.
References:
Goldsmith,
M., Lyons, L, & Freas,
A. (2000). Coaching for leadership: how the world’s
greatest coaches help leaders learn. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey Bass/Pheiffer.
Hatch, T. (1998). The differences in
theory that matters in the practice of school improvement.
American Educational Research Journal, 3(1), 3-31.
Schein, E. (1999). Process consultation
revisited: building the helping relationship. New York,
NY: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.
See our Feature
Article Archives for past articles!
|